Stryker v. Mayor

19 Johns. 179
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1821
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 Johns. 179 (Stryker v. Mayor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stryker v. Mayor, 19 Johns. 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is clearly distinguishable from that of Udall v. The Village of Brooklyn, just decided. The city and county of New-York includes the whole of the rivers and harbour, to actual low water mark, on the opposite shores; and although permanent , erections, such as wharves and store-houses, may, from time to time, vary the line of jurisdiction, yet it cannot be allowed that Brooklyn is to be extended by means of a floating vessel in the river. [181]*181although she may be fastened to the dock. The vessel, in this case, was in the city of New-York; and the defendant below was not licensed there, to do the act complained of. The judgment ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Dock Co. v. Flinn-O'Rourke Co.
121 Misc. 155 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)
People v. Prillen
73 A.D. 207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Atlantic Dock Co. v. City of Brooklyn
1 Abb. Ct. App. 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Clement v. Burns
43 N.H. 609 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stryker-v-mayor-nysupct-1821.