Struve v. Droge

62 How. Pr. 258
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedSeptember 15, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 62 How. Pr. 258 (Struve v. Droge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Struve v. Droge, 62 How. Pr. 258 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

— The moving papers do not show that appellant has failed to pay to the justice or the clerk of this court the costs of the action as required by section 3047 of the Code. The affidavit merely states that “ no undertaking on said appeal has ever been approved, filed or served, and that said appellant has not given the security on appeal by deposit or otherwise as required by the rules and practice of this court.” lío undertaking or deposit is required to perfect an appeal. The section cited provides for the manner of perfecting the appeal so far as service on the justice is concerned, and that only requires the payment of the costs of the action. The motion is evidently not based on a failure to comply with that section.

Motion denied with five dollars costs, to abide event of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 How. Pr. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/struve-v-droge-nyctcompl-1881.