Strutz v. Rochester Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strutz v. Rochester Railway Co.

85 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 85 N.Y.S. 1148 (Strutz v. Rochester Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strutz v. Rochester Railway Co., 85 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and fact, unless the plaintiff stipulates to modify the judgment by reducing the verdict to $5,-500 as of the date of rendition thereof, in which event, the judgment, as so modified, and order, are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

STOVER, J.,

votes for affirmance, without modification, and McLENNAN, P. J:, votes for reversal, upon the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and fact, unless the plaintiff stipulates to modify the judgment by reducing the verdict to $5,-500 as of the date of rendition thereof, in which event, the judgment, as so modified, and order, are affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

STOVER, J.,

votes for affirmance, without modification, and McLENNAN, P. J:, votes for reversal, upon the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strutz-v-rochester-railway-co-nyappdiv-1903.