Strunk v. U.S. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 22, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2008-2234·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-2234 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF STATE, et aI., ) ) Defendants. ) -------------------------)

ORDER

I ~- February ~,2012 [Dkt. # 50,52]

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiffs Notice of Motion for Reconsideration []by Leave to File a

Motion for Vaughn Index [Dkt. #50] is DENIED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #52] is

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of entry ofthis Order, the defendants shall

file a renewed motion for summary judgment with respect to the information withheld under

Exemption 7(E).

SO ORDERED.

:2~.~ RICHARD J. N United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strunk v. U.S. Department of State, (D.D.C. 2012).

Strunk v. U.S. Department of State (Strunk v. U.S. Department of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.