Strunk v. Revenge Cab Corp.

98 A.D.3d 1030, 950 N.Y.S.2d 596
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 98 A.D.3d 1030 (Strunk v. Revenge Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strunk v. Revenge Cab Corp., 98 A.D.3d 1030, 950 N.Y.S.2d 596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens [1031]*1031County (Taylor, J.), entered June 20, 2011, which denied her motion, denominated as one for leave to renew her prior motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate an order of the same court dated February 19, 2010, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), upon her default in opposing the motion, which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate the order dated February 19, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs motion, denominated as one for leave to renew, did not offer any new facts not offered in support of her prior motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate an order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), entered upon her default in opposing the motion. Therefore, the motion, denominated as one for leave to renew, was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see CPLR 2221 [d] [2]; [e] [2]; Blackwell v Mikevin Mgt. III, LLC, 88 AD3d 836, 838 [2011]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landmark Capital Partners, LLC v. Greaves
2018 NY Slip Op 5672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Jenkins v. Astorino
2017 NY Slip Op 7730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Arch Bay Holdings, LLC-Series 2010C v. Daisy
132 A.D.3d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Bank of New York v. Segui
120 A.D.3d 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Maragliano v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ
119 A.D.3d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Poulard v. Judkins
102 A.D.3d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A.D.3d 1030, 950 N.Y.S.2d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strunk-v-revenge-cab-corp-nyappdiv-2012.