Strum v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
96 N.E.2d 192, 301 N.Y. 803
This text of 96 N.E.2d 192 (Strum v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Strum v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York, 96 N.E.2d 192, 301 N.Y. 803 (N.Y. 1950).
Opinion
Joseph B. Strum, Appellant,
v.
Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Benjamin M. Zelman and Joshua J. Nasaw for appellant.
John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Morris Weissberg of counsel), for respondents.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Board of Education v. Rickard
32 A.D.2d 135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Nyboe v. Allen
10 Misc. 2d 895 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Gimprich v. Board of Education
118 N.E.2d 578 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Kussin v. Board of Education
278 A.D. 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 192, 301 N.Y. 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strum-v-bd-of-educ-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1950.