Struble v. Goord

268 A.D.2d 845, 700 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 845 (Struble v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Struble v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 845, 700 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

[846]*846Petitioner was found, guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from using controlled substances after two EMIT tests performed on petitioner’s urine sample yielded positive results for the presence of cannabinoids and opiates. In our view, the misbehavior report combined with the testimony from the correction officer who tested the sample, constitute substantial evidence supporting the charge of drug use (see, Matter of Kussius v Walker, 247 AD2d 911, 912). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, a proper foundation was laid for the reliance on the positive test results and the Hearing Officer was within his province in crediting the testimony of the misbehavior report’s author (see, Matter of Gonzalez v Selsky, 253 AD2d 940). We have examined petitioner’s remaining challenges and, to the extent that they have been preserved for appellate review, find them to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellison v. Goord
274 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 845, 700 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/struble-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.