Strouse v. United Parcel Service

245 A.D.2d 1117, 666 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13935
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 1117 (Strouse v. United Parcel Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strouse v. United Parcel Service, 245 A.D.2d 1117, 666 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Richard [1118]*1118A. Strouse (plaintiff) tore his biceps while lifting a box that he brought to a customer service center of defendant, United Parcel Service, for shipment. It is uncontroverted that an employee of defendant, having been informed by plaintiff that the box weighed as much as 130 pounds, directed plaintiff to put it on a counter scale for lighter packages. The employee then directed plaintiff to move the box to a floor scale. Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the sole proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury was plaintiff’s failure to request any assistance. Plaintiff was injured while moving the box from the counter, and the risk of his injury was not so remote that it could not have been anticipated. Thus, the actions of defendant’s employee may give rise to liability in tort (see, Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578, 583-585). It is for the trier of fact to resolve whether it was foreseeable in the normal course of events that plaintiff would move the box from the counter without assistance after being directed to do so by defendant’s employee (see, Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 315, rearg denied 52 NY2d 784). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strouse v. United Parcel Service
277 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 1117, 666 N.Y.S.2d 97, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strouse-v-united-parcel-service-nyappdiv-1997.