Strouse v. New York El. Ry. Co.

New York Supreme Court

Strouse v. New York El. Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 938, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 937

DecidedMarch 31, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 938 (Strouse v. New York El. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strouse v. New York El. Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 938, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 937 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the sums fixed by the referee as past damages and as the value of the plaintiff’s easements are not excessive, and are supported by the evidence. The other questions presented arise in consequence of exceptions to the admission and exclusion of testimony. We think that all of the questions have been passed upon by prior adjudications of this court in favor of the respondents, and that no error was committed by the referee that requires us to reverse the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think the sums fixed by the referee as past damages and as the value of the plaintiff’s easements are not excessive, and are supported by the evidence. The other questions presented arise in consequence of exceptions to the admission and exclusion of testimony. We think that all of the questions have been passed upon by prior adjudications of this court in favor of the respondents, and that no error was committed by the referee that requires us to reverse the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.Y.S. 938, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strouse-v-new-york-el-ry-co-nysupct-1892.