Stroup v. State

28 S.E.2d 118, 196 Ga. 840, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 442
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1943·No. 14684.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. It was no valid objection to the introduction of a photograph of certain premises where a crime was alleged to have taken place, that the photograph was made on a date later than that on which, as alleged, the occurrence took place, where it appeared from the evi- - dence of a witness on whom the crime was charged to have been committed that the photograph correctly portrayed the place referred to.

'2 The evidence supported the verdict, which had the approval of the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stroup v. State, 28 S.E.2d 118, 196 Ga. 840, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 442 (Ga. 1943).

28 S.E.2d 118 (Stroup v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stroup v. Mount
30 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)