Stroup v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stroup v. State

28 S.E.2d 118, 196 Ga. 840, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 442

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1943

Docket14684.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 S.E.2d 118 (Stroup v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stroup v. State, 28 S.E.2d 118, 196 Ga. 840, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 442 (Ga. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. It was no valid objection to the introduction of a photograph of certain premises where a crime was alleged to have taken place, that the photograph was made on a date later than that on which, as alleged, the occurrence took place, where it appeared from the evi- - dence of a witness on whom the crime was charged to have been committed that the photograph correctly portrayed the place referred to.

'2 The evidence supported the verdict, which had the approval of the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

1. It was no valid objection to the introduction of a photograph of certain premises where a crime was alleged to have taken place, that the photograph was made on a date later than that on which, as alleged, the occurrence took place, where it appeared from the evi- - dence of a witness on whom the crime was charged to have been committed that the photograph correctly portrayed the place referred to.

'2 The evidence supported the verdict, which had the approval of the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E.2d 118, 196 Ga. 840, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroup-v-state-ga-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack