Stroup v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stroup v. State

177 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15148, 2015 WL 5920197

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 12, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-3942

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 3d 1009 (Stroup v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stroup v. State, 177 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15148, 2015 WL 5920197 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Andrew Stroup, challenges his sentence and the $100 indigent legal assistance lien that the trial court imposed without informing him of his right to a hearing to dispute the amount of the lien. We affirm Appellant’s sentence with[1010]*1010out further comment. We also affirm the $100 indigent legal assistance lien in this felony case in light of our recent holding in Mills v. State, 1D14-1805, 2015 WL 5447808, at *1-3 (Fla. 1st DCA June, 17, 2015) (en banc) (holding that notice and hearing are not required before the imposition of a legislatively mandated minimum public defender’s lien and receding from all decisions holding to the contrary).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Andrew Stroup, challenges his sentence and the $100 indigent legal assistance lien that the trial court imposed without informing him of his right to a hearing to dispute the amount of the lien. We affirm Appellant’s sentence with[1010]*1010out further comment. We also affirm the $100 indigent legal assistance lien in this felony case in light of our recent holding in Mills v. State, 1D14-1805, 2015 WL 5447808, at *1-3 (Fla. 1st DCA June, 17, 2015) (en banc) (holding that notice and hearing are not required before the imposition of a legislatively mandated minimum public defender’s lien and receding from all decisions holding to the contrary).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15148, 2015 WL 5920197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroup-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack