Stroud v. Whitman, Receiver of & Sinnissippi Insurance

Indiana Supreme Court

Stroud v. Whitman, Receiver of & Sinnissippi Insurance

33 Ind. 71

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Ind. 71 (Stroud v. Whitman, Receiver of & Sinnissippi Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stroud v. Whitman, Receiver of & Sinnissippi Insurance, 33 Ind. 71 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

This case is in all respects similar to, and involves precisely ,the same questions discussed and decided in, Boland v. Whitman, Receiver, &c., at this term, ante, p. [72]*7264, except the questions arising in that case on the sixth paragraph of the answer.

A. B. Carlton, for appellants. F. Wilson, A. C. Voris, J. E. McDonald, A. L. Roache, and E. M. McDonald, for appellee.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, for errors of the court in sustaining demurrers to the second and third paragraphs of the answer, and the cause remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrers to those paragraphs, and for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

This case is in all respects similar to, and involves precisely ,the same questions discussed and decided in, Boland v. Whitman, Receiver, &c., at this term, ante, p. [72]*7264, except the questions arising in that case on the sixth paragraph of the answer.

A. B. Carlton, for appellants. F. Wilson, A. C. Voris, J. E. McDonald, A. L. Roache, and E. M. McDonald, for appellee.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, for errors of the court in sustaining demurrers to the second and third paragraphs of the answer, and the cause remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrers to those paragraphs, and for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ind. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroud-v-whitman-receiver-of-sinnissippi-insurance-ind-1870.