Stroud v. TJX Companies/HomeGoods

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 23, 2024
Docket3:22-cv-00643
StatusUnknown

This text of Stroud v. TJX Companies/HomeGoods (Stroud v. TJX Companies/HomeGoods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stroud v. TJX Companies/HomeGoods, (W.D.N.C. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:22-cv-643-MOC-DCK

KIMBERLY L. STROUD, ) ) Plaintiff, pro se, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ORDER ) TJX COMPANIES/HOME GOODS, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. No. 11). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55 “authorizes the entry of a default judgment when a defendant fails ‘to plead or otherwise defend’ in accordance with the Rules.” United States v. Moradi, 673 F.2d 725, 727 (4th Cir. 1982). The Federal Rules create a two-step process for entry of default judgment. First, the non-defaulting party must move for entry of default under Rule 55(a). See FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). “The Clerk of the Court's interlocutory entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides notice to the defaulting party prior to the entry of default judgment by the court.” Hummel v. Hall, 868 F. Supp. 2d 543, 547 (W.D. Va. 2012) (citing Carbon Fuel Co. v. USX Corp., 1998 WL 480809, at *2 (4th Cir. Aug. 6, 1998)). Once the Clerk of Court has issued an entry of default, the non-defaulting party may then move for entry of default judgment under Rule 55(b). Id. Here, Plaintiff has not yet moved for entry of default by the Clerk’s office under 1 Rule 55(a). Thus, Plaintiff's pro se Motion for Default Judgment, (Doc. No. 11), is premature and will be DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: January 23, 2024

Kosten . Max O. Cogburn Jr & United States District Judge Hira gg teat

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Nasser Moradi
673 F.2d 725 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
Hummel v. Hall
868 F. Supp. 2d 543 (W.D. Virginia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stroud v. TJX Companies/HomeGoods, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroud-v-tjx-companieshomegoods-ncwd-2024.