Stroud v. State
325 So. 2d 204, 295 Ala. 424, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1984
Opinion
On preliminary examination, the petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 56 Ala.App. 692, 325 So.2d 200, was granted. Upon further consideration, we hold that the writ was improvidently granted and is due to be quashed notwithstanding the able argument of petitioner’s counsel who did not represent him at nisi prius.
Writ of certiorari quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stroud v. State, 325 So. 2d 204, 295 Ala. 424, 1976 Ala. LEXIS 1984 (Ala. 1976).
325 So. 2d 204 (Stroud v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McConico v. State
458 So. 2d 743 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Millican v. State
423 So. 2d 268 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Brager v. State
380 So. 2d 401 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)