Stroud v. Calamus Irrigation District
235 N.W. 97, 120 Neb. 719, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 54
Opinion
The question presented here for determination is decided in Elliott v. Calamus Irrigation District, ante, p. 714. By stipulation of the parties the three actions, namely, Elliott v. Calamus Irrigation District, Cameron v. Calamus Irrigation District, and Stroud v. Calamus Irrigation District, were combined and tried as one case. Our decision in the Elliott case therefore controls in the present case. It follows that the judgment herein must be and it hereby is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stroud v. Calamus Irrigation District, 235 N.W. 97, 120 Neb. 719, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 54 (Neb. 1931).
235 N.W. 97 (Stroud v. Calamus Irrigation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.