Strother v. Burnet

287 U.S. 314, 53 S. Ct. 152, 77 L. Ed. 330, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 20, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1091, 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 999
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 5, 1932·No. 105·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The decision in this case, which is here on certiorari, turns on that in Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, just decided, ante, p. 308.

Petitioner, a stockholder in the Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co., received dividends upon his stock which were, to some extent, a distribution of the royalty payments received by the corporation and involved in its suit against the Commissioner. The ruling of the Commissioner in this case, that the amounts so distributed from royalties were taxable income, was upheld by the Board of Tax Appeals, 18 B. T. A. 901, and by the Court of *315 Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 55 F. (2d) 626, which remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings, to enable the petitioner to offer additional testimony having a bearing on the correct computation of the deficiency, in accordance with the opinion of the court. The parties stipulate that the decision of this case shall be controlled by that of Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, and the judgment below is accordingly

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strother v. Burnet, 287 U.S. 314, 53 S. Ct. 152, 77 L. Ed. 330, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 20, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1091, 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 999 (1932).

287 U.S. 314 (Strother v. Burnet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laughlin v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 47 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Buffalo Eagle Mines, Inc. v. Commissioner
37 B.T.A. 843 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1938)
Umsted v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
72 F.2d 328 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
George D. Harter Bank v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 941 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)