Stropp v. Social Security Administration
This text of Stropp v. Social Security Administration (Stropp v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Kenneth Stropp,
Plaintiff, v Civil Action No. 08-123 (HHK) Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
On March 2, 2009, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s third amended
complaint, asserting that the plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative appeals before filing this
case. Defendants’ assertions were supported by affidavits and relevant documents. On March 5,
2009, the Court issued an order advising plaintiff of his obligation to respond and informing
plaintiff that if he did not respond by April 9, 2009, the motion may be granted as conceded.
Upon motion from plaintiff, an extension of time to respond was granted, making May 5, 2009
the revised deadline for plaintiff’s response. Plaintiff has not filed a response or sought an
additional extension of time. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED as conceded, and this case is
DISMISSED without prejudice.
This is a final, appealable order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4.
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR. Date: July 2, 2009 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stropp v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stropp-v-social-security-administration-dcd-2009.