Stropp v. Piedmont Regional Jail

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2006·No. 06-7366·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7366

KENNETH J. STROPP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL; OFFICER HENDERSON; LIEUTENANT AGNEW; DOCTOR TONEY; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; NURSE EMPLOYEES OF MED. CART.; SERGEANT VANDANARE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00236-JBF)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: December 1, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth J. Stropp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth J. Stropp appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without prejudice for

failure to comply with a court order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by of the district

court. See Stropp v. Piedmont Reg’l Jail, No. 2:06-cv-00236-JBF

(E.D. Va. filed June 20, 2006 & entered June 21, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stropp v. Piedmont Regional Jail, (4th Cir. 2006).

Stropp v. Piedmont Regional Jail (Stropp v. Piedmont Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related