Stroops v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided November 22, 2022·No. 3:21-cv-00176·Unknown

Opinion

DISTRICT OF OREGON ARIN STROOPS, Civil No. 3:21-CV-176-AR Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U:S.C. § 2412(D) g || Acting Commissioner of the Social Securit Administration, Defendant. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that attorney fees in the amount of $5,862.72 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA), If it is determined that Plaintiff's EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, based upo Plaintiff's assignment of this fee to their attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel at Dellert Baird Law Offices, PLLC, PO Box 429, Spanaway, WA, 98387. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of November, 2022. | \\ Jeffrey Armistead United States Magistrate Judge

Page 1 ORDER [3:21-CV-176-AR]|

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stroops v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

Stroops v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Stroops v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)