Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stroock & Co. v. Lichtenthal, Inc.

Stroock & Co. v. Lichtenthal, Inc.

225 A.D. 732
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 732 (Stroock & Co. v. Lichtenthal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stroock & Co. v. Lichtenthal, Inc., 225 A.D. 732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We believe the defendant should be given an opportunity to frame his pleadings so as to present the alleged defenses and counterclaims set forth in the proposed amended answer. We do not, however, depart from our former opinion on the merits (224 App. Div. 19). The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Black
31 Misc. 2d 184 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Clarson Construction Co. v. Vespa
21 Misc. 2d 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Hansen v. Storm
21 Misc. 2d 561 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Albano v. Michaelsen
14 Misc. 2d 76 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Travlos v. Commercial Union of America, Inc.
135 Misc. 895 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stroock-co-v-lichtenthal-inc-nyappdiv-1928.