Strong v. Thompson
This text of 33 F. App'x 144 (Strong v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David M. Strong appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Strong’s action claiming discrimination on the basis of race and violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and denying Strong’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Strong v. Thompson, Sec’y, Health & Human Servs., No. CA-00-3507-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2001; filed Sept. 14, 2001 & entered Oct. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 F. App'x 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-thompson-ca4-2002.