Strong v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Strong v. Thompson

33 F. App'x 144

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 1, 2002·No. No. 01-2274·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David M. Strong appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Strong’s action claiming discrimination on the basis of race and violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and denying Strong’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Strong v. Thompson, Sec’y, Health & Human Servs., No. CA-00-3507-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2001; filed Sept. 14, 2001 & entered Oct. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David M. Strong appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Strong’s action claiming discrimination on the basis of race and violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and denying Strong’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Strong v. Thompson, Sec’y, Health & Human Servs., No. CA-00-3507-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2001; filed Sept. 14, 2001 & entered Oct. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Strong v. Thompson, 33 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

33 F. App'x 144 (Strong v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.