Strong v. Strong
This text of 14 A.D.2d 670 (Strong v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff wife has not been candid about the assets possessed by her, especially if one credit her claim in her reply affidavit that she is the owner of the stock that she eoncededly obtained from defendant husband. In view of that circumstance and because she is possessed of some assets, although how much still remains she has never made clear, the modifications above set forth are merited. Of course, there should be an early trial. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 670, 219 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-strong-nyappdiv-1961.