Strong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Strong v. State

1926 OK CR 326, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 95, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 313

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Okla. Crim. 114 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 11, 1926·No. No. A-6079.·Published

Opinion

BESSEY, P. J.

This is a joint appeal from a conviction for a violation of the prohibitory law. The plaintiff in error, Guy Strong, has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal as to himself only. For good cause shown the motion is allowed, and the appeal as to Guy Strong is dismissed, with instructions to the court to issue mandate forthwith, and the appeal as to Frank Johnson is continued for further proceedings in due course.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BESSEY, P. J.

This is a joint appeal from a conviction for a violation of the prohibitory law. The plaintiff in error, Guy Strong, has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal as to himself only. For good cause shown the motion is allowed, and the appeal as to Guy Strong is dismissed, with instructions to the court to issue mandate forthwith, and the appeal as to Frank Johnson is continued for further proceedings in due course.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Strong v. State, 1926 OK CR 326, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 95, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 313 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

1926 OK CR 326 (Strong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.