Strong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Strong v. State

1926 OK CR 326, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 95, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 313

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 11, 1926

DocketNo. A-6079.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 326 (Strong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. State, 1926 OK CR 326, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 95, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 313 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BESSEY, P. J.

This is a joint appeal from a conviction for a violation of the prohibitory law. The plaintiff in error, Guy Strong, has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal as to himself only. For good cause shown the motion is allowed, and the appeal as to Guy Strong is dismissed, with instructions to the court to issue mandate forthwith, and the appeal as to Frank Johnson is continued for further proceedings in due course.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BESSEY, P. J.

This is a joint appeal from a conviction for a violation of the prohibitory law. The plaintiff in error, Guy Strong, has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal as to himself only. For good cause shown the motion is allowed, and the appeal as to Guy Strong is dismissed, with instructions to the court to issue mandate forthwith, and the appeal as to Frank Johnson is continued for further proceedings in due course.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 326, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 95, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.