Strong v. State of Wisconsin

• Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
• Decided: December 7, 2021
• Docket: 2:21-cv-00993
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ DENNIS C. STRONG,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-993-pp

STATE OF WISCONSIN, WARDEN MICHAEL MEISNER, and TERRY SAWALL,

Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FILING FEE (DKT. NO. 2) ______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff Dennis C. Strong, who was confined at he Fox Lake Correctional Institution when he filed this case, and is representing himself, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983, dkt. no. 1, along with a motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, dkt. no. 2. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), an incarcerated person may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil judgment without prepaying the filing fee if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Strikes include any case dismissed on any of the three enumerated grounds both before and after the enactment of the PLRA. Evans v. Ill. Dep’t of Corrs., 150 F.3d 810, 811 (7th Cir. 1998) (citing Abdul-Wadood v. Nathan, 91 F.3d 1023, 1025 (7th Cir. 1996)). Court records show that the plaintiff has accumulated three strikes: (1) Strong v. Wisconsin Dep’t of Corrs., et al., Case No. 17-cv-967-NJ (E.D. Wis.), dismissed for failure to state a claim on March 22, 2018; (2) Strong v. Wis. State Public Defender, et al., Case No. 17-cv-1714-PP (E.D. Wis.), dismissed for

failure to state a claim on July 25, 2018; and (3) Strong v. Thompson, Case No. 17-cv-981-JPS (E.D. Wis.), dismissed for failure to state a claim on March 28, 2018. Because the plaintiff previously has filed at least three cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim, the court must deny his motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. To meet the imminent danger requirement of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), a plaintiff must allege a physical injury that is imminent or occurring at the time

he filed the complaint, and the threat or prison condition causing the physical injury must be real and proximate. Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003) (citing Lewis v. Sullivan, 279 F.3d 526, 529 (7th Cir. 2002)). “Allegations of past harm do not suffice” to show imminent danger. Id. at 330 (citing Heimermann v. Litscher, 337 F.3d 781, 782 (7th Cir. 2003)). Generally, courts “deny leave to proceed IFP when a prisoner’s claims of imminent danger are conclusory or ridiculous.” Id. at 331 (citing Heimerman, 337 F.3d at 782).

The plaintiff alleges that in 2018 at the Redgranite Correctional Institution, the defendants retaliated against him by placing him in solitary confinement after he complained about officers’ sexual misconduct and harassment against incarcerated persons. Dkt. No. 1 at 4-9. These allegations do not meet the imminent danger requirement. The court will deny the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. If the plaintiff wants to proceed with this case, he must pay the full civil filing fee of $402 (the sum of the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee) by the deadline below. Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 433-34 (7th Cir. 1997), rev'd on other grounds by Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000) and Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); 7th Cir. R. 3(b). The court will dismiss the case if the plaintiff does not pay the full filing fee in time for the court to receive it by the end of the day on December 22, 2021. If the court receives the full filing fee by the end of the day on December 22, 2021, the court will screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 81915A. The court DENIES the plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Dkt. No. 2. The court ORDERS that the plaintiff must forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $402 as the full filing fee in this case in time for the court to receive it by the end of the day on December 22, 2021. The plaintiff must clearly identify the payment by the case name and number assigned to this case. If the court does not receive the full filing fee by the December 22, 2021 deadline, the court will dismiss the case without further notice or hearing. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 7th day of December, 2021. BY THE COURT:

Chief United States District Judge