Strong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Strong v. State

591 So. 2d 1158, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 440, 1992 WL 9718

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1992

DocketNo. 91-00661

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 1158 (Strong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. State, 591 So. 2d 1158, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 440, 1992 WL 9718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for first degree felony murder and attempted robbery with a firearm. We find no merit in any of the issues raised by the appellant and affirm.

The appellant correctly argues that he is entitled to jail time credit on both his sentences, which are concurrent. We interpret the written sentences as allowing 191 days jail time credit on both sentences. We affirm the sentences as so interpreted.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for first degree felony murder and attempted robbery with a firearm. We find no merit in any of the issues raised by the appellant and affirm.

The appellant correctly argues that he is entitled to jail time credit on both his sentences, which are concurrent. We interpret the written sentences as allowing 191 days jail time credit on both sentences. We affirm the sentences as so interpreted.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 1158, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 440, 1992 WL 9718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.