Strong v. Northwestern Elevated R. R. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Strong v. Northwestern Elevated R. R. Co.

64 Ill. App. 533, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 960

DecidedMarch 31, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ill. App. 533 (Strong v. Northwestern Elevated R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. Northwestern Elevated R. R. Co., 64 Ill. App. 533, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 960 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

per Curiam.

Inasmuch as this court in the case of Phelps v. Union Elevated Railroad Company, 60 Ill. App. 471, held that street abutting property owners can not have an injunction to prevent the construction of an elevated railroad upon such street, on the ground that the ordinance of the city permitting such construction is invalid, we must affirm the decree of the lower court, dismissing the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

per Curiam.

Inasmuch as this court in the case of Phelps v. Union Elevated Railroad Company, 60 Ill. App. 471, held that street abutting property owners can not have an injunction to prevent the construction of an elevated railroad upon such street, on the ground that the ordinance of the city permitting such construction is invalid, we must affirm the decree of the lower court, dismissing the bill.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Ill. App. 533, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-northwestern-elevated-r-r-co-illappct-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack