Strong v. Gaskill
25 A. 19, 53 N.J.L. 665, 24 Vroom 665, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 15
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8.
For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strong v. Gaskill, 25 A. 19, 53 N.J.L. 665, 24 Vroom 665, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 15 (N.J. 1891).
25 A. 19 (Strong v. Gaskill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friendly Consumer Discount Co. v. Foell
121 A.2d 434 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
American Soda Fountain Co. v. Stolzenbach
68 A. 1078 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908)