Strong v. Gaskill

25 A. 19, 53 N.J.L. 665, 24 Vroom 665, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 15
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8.

For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strong v. Gaskill, 25 A. 19, 53 N.J.L. 665, 24 Vroom 665, 1891 N.J. LEXIS 15 (N.J. 1891).

25 A. 19 (Strong v. Gaskill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friendly Consumer Discount Co. v. Foell
121 A.2d 434 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
American Soda Fountain Co. v. Stolzenbach
68 A. 1078 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908)