Strong v. Eamtrakul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strong v. Eamtrakul

215 A.D.2d 104, 625 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 104 (Strong v. Eamtrakul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. Eamtrakul, 215 A.D.2d 104, 625 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Bruce Kaplan, J.), entered on or about December 5, 1994, which, inter alia, directed that overnight visitation with petitioner father take place away from respondent mother’s home once a week, commencing January 13, 1995, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was ample evidence in the record to support the pendente lite relief granted, including the testimony of the parties and two experts. Moreover, the Guardian Ad Litem, who was in favor of one overnight visit per week between the father and the infant, had on prior occasions submitted reports to the court which contradicted most, if not all, of respondent’s allegations of petitioner’s unfitness.

We have considered respondent’s other allegations and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Bruce Kaplan, J.), entered on or about December 5, 1994, which, inter alia, directed that overnight visitation with petitioner father take place away from respondent mother’s home once a week, commencing January 13, 1995, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was ample evidence in the record to support the pendente lite relief granted, including the testimony of the parties and two experts. Moreover, the Guardian Ad Litem, who was in favor of one overnight visit per week between the father and the infant, had on prior occasions submitted reports to the court which contradicted most, if not all, of respondent’s allegations of petitioner’s unfitness.

We have considered respondent’s other allegations and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 104, 625 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-eamtrakul-nyappdiv-1995.