Strong v. Conservation Commission
615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 902, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 360
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 435, is granted, limited to the following question:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly place the burden on the conservation commission to establish that no feasible and prudent alternative existed to the plaintiffs’ application?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strong v. Conservation Commission, 615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 902, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 360 (Colo. 1992).
615 A.2d 1046 (Strong v. Conservation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strong v. Conservation Commission
627 A.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)