Strong v. Conservation Commission
615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 902, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 360
This text of 615 A.2d 1046 (Strong v. Conservation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Strong v. Conservation Commission, 615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 902, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 360 (Colo. 1992).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 435, is granted, limited to the following question:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly place the burden on the conservation commission to establish that no feasible and prudent alternative existed to the plaintiffs’ application?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Strong v. Conservation Commission
627 A.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 902, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-conservation-commission-conn-1992.