Strong v. Allen

Illinois Supreme Court

Strong v. Allen

40 Ill. 43

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 43 (Strong v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong v. Allen, 40 Ill. 43 (Ill. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is no law prescribing the time within which the record must be filed in a cause brought to this court upon writ of error; that subject is regulated by Rule 75. 34 111. The omission to file the transcript of the record on or before the second day of the term, as prescribed by that rule, is not ground for a dismissal of the writ; hut in such case the defendant in error may ask a rule upon the clerk of the court below to make return to the writ of error.

Motion to dismiss overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

There is no law prescribing the time within which the record must be filed in a cause brought to this court upon writ of error; that subject is regulated by Rule 75. 34 111. The omission to file the transcript of the record on or before the second day of the term, as prescribed by that rule, is not ground for a dismissal of the writ; hut in such case the defendant in error may ask a rule upon the clerk of the court below to make return to the writ of error.

Motion to dismiss overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Ill. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-allen-ill-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack