Strong Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

41 B.T.A. 1273
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided May 29, 1940·No. Docket No. 95626·Published

Opinions

[1277] OPINION.

OppeR :

The present issue calls for the application to the foregoing facts of the provisions of section 26 (c) (2) of Revenue Act of 19361 entitling a corporation to a “credit” against the “undistributed profits tax” if it complies with certain requirements.

On this record, compliance with these conditions is questionable only in one respect. There was a written' contract executed prior to May 1, 1936, containing a provision expressly dealing with the disposition of earnings and profits for the taxable year. The credit claimed is for an amount equal to the portion of such earnings and profits required to be paid in discharge of a debt, and this amount was paid in the taxable year. The sole remaining condition is that such portion of the earnings and profits be required by the contract to be paid or irrevocably set aside within the taxable year. We are of the opinion that the “application” to the indebtedness of the designated portion of the earnings may, for present purposes, be considered to be called for by the contract “as of” the taxable year, Michigan Silica Co., 41 B. T. A. 511, 515, and therefore to constitute the irrevocable setting aside contemplated by the statute. The credit should have been allowed and respondent’s determination to the contrary is overruled.

Repair and replacement expenses may be deducted as stipulated.

Reviewed by the Board.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strong Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 41 B.T.A. 1273 (bta 1940).

41 B.T.A. 1273 (Strong Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.