Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber

Court of Appeals of Texas

Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber

DecidedMay 30, 2002

Docket13-02-00196-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber (Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-196-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

STRONG HOLD CONSTRUCTION AND

P. ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, Appellants,

v.

EL CLAVO SALES, L.P. D/B/A EL CLAVO LUMBER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, STRONG HOLD CONSTRUCTION AND P. ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-11-4583-A. After the notice of appeal was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties= agreement.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30th day of May, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-196-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

STRONG HOLD CONSTRUCTION AND

P. ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, Appellants,

v.

EL CLAVO SALES, L.P. D/B/A EL CLAVO LUMBER, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, STRONG HOLD CONSTRUCTION AND P. ARMANDO GUTIERREZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-11-4583-A. After the notice of appeal was filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties= agreement.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30th day of May, 2002.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Strong Hold Construction, Inc. and P. Armando Gutierrez v. El Clavo Sales, L.P. D/B/A El Clavo Lumber, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-hold-construction-inc-and-p-armando-gutierr-texapp-2002.