Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

88 N.Y.S. 1117

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 5, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given by both parties the case was one for the jury, and in its submission no reversible error was committed by the court in its charge; the defendant having made no request for further instructions, or that additional questions should be specifically submitted. Nor are the damages excessive. Upon the record as it stands, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given by both parties the case was one for the jury, and in its submission no reversible error was committed by the court in its charge; the defendant having made no request for further instructions, or that additional questions should be specifically submitted. Nor are the damages excessive. Upon the record as it stands, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 88 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

88 N.Y.S. 1117 (Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.