Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

88 N.Y.S. 1117

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 1117 (Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strone v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 88 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given by both parties the case was one for the jury, and in its submission no reversible error was committed by the court in its charge; the defendant having made no request for further instructions, or that additional questions should be specifically submitted. Nor are the damages excessive. Upon the record as it stands, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the evidence given by both parties the case was one for the jury, and in its submission no reversible error was committed by the court in its charge; the defendant having made no request for further instructions, or that additional questions should be specifically submitted. Nor are the damages excessive. Upon the record as it stands, the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strone-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.