Stromn v. State

552 So. 2d 352, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594, 1989 WL 142954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1989·No. No. 89-0496·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We find the record of the question and answer exchange between the appellant and the trial court insufficient to constitute a factual predicate for the trial court’s adjudication of direct criminal contempt. See Silver v. State, 117 So.2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stromn v. State, 552 So. 2d 352, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594, 1989 WL 142954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

552 So. 2d 352 (Stromn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silver v. State
117 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)