Stromn v. State
552 So. 2d 352, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594, 1989 WL 142954
This text of 552 So. 2d 352 (Stromn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stromn v. State, 552 So. 2d 352, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594, 1989 WL 142954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
REVERSED. We find the record of the question and answer exchange between the appellant and the trial court insufficient to constitute a factual predicate for the trial court’s adjudication of direct criminal contempt. See Silver v. State, 117 So.2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Silver v. State
117 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
552 So. 2d 352, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6594, 1989 WL 142954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stromn-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.