Stromberger v. State
This text of 595 So. 2d 587 (Stromberger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dax Stromberger challenges his departure sentence for purchase of cocaine. We reverse because none of the trial court’s written reasons permit a departure sentence.
In 1989 Stromberger pleaded guilty to purchase of cocaine. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed Stromberger on probation for a period of two years. Following the filing of an amended affidavit for violation of probation alleging that Stromberger was arrested in Tallahassee, Florida, for throwing pipe bombs
The trial court listed eight reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. The second, fourth, and eighth reasons are invalid because factors relating to the violation of probation are not valid grounds for imposing a departure sentence for the original offense. See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989). The third reason, diagnosis as a sociopath with poor prognosis for future behavior patterns, has been held invalid. See Coleman v. State, 515 So.2d 313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), review denied, 523 So.2d 576 (Fla.1988) (suffering from difficult-to-treat personality disorder and speculating on possible future violence are invalid reasons for departure). All other reasons listed are not supported by the record.
Reversed and remanded for sentencing within the sentencing guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
595 So. 2d 587, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3322, 1992 WL 57893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stromberger-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.