Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stromberg v. State

Stromberg v. State

507 So. 2d 175, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 1987
DocketNo. BM-282
StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 175 (Stromberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stromberg v. State, 507 So. 2d 175, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the evidence, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal and that the state met its burden in this circumstantial evidence case. See Fowler v. State, 492 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The trial court imposed a legal sentence upon appellant for her crimes. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking further relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and ERVIN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fowler v. State
492 So. 2d 1344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 So. 2d 175, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1268, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stromberg-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.