Strom-Sell v. COUNCIL FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS, INC.

2000 ND 19, 606 N.W.2d 108, 2000 N.D. LEXIS 25, 2000 WL 199433
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 22, 2000
Docket990295
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2000 ND 19 (Strom-Sell v. COUNCIL FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strom-Sell v. COUNCIL FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS, INC., 2000 ND 19, 606 N.W.2d 108, 2000 N.D. LEXIS 25, 2000 WL 199433 (N.D. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Paula Strom-Sell appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion for a stay of execution. Essentially, Strom-Sell’s present appeal challenges an award of costs and disbursements which was part of a judgment previously affirmed by this Court in Strom-Sell v. Council for Concerned, Citizens, Inc., 1999 ND 132, 597 N.W.2d 414. We conclude this appeal is frivolous and completely without merit, and therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶ 2] In addition, this Court awards Ap-pellees costs on appeal to be taxed and allowed in the court below under Rule 39, N.D.R.App.P., and damages in the amount of $1,000 under Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P. Under Rule 38, this Court may award “just damages and single or double costs including reasonable attorney’s fees” if we determine an appeal is frivolous. We have stated an appeal is frivolous if it is “flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which could be seen as evidence of bad faith.” Matter of Estate of Opatz, 554 N.W.2d 813, 817 (N.D.1996). This is such an appeal. We, therefore, direct the Clerk of the Supreme Court to enter judgment for the Appellees accordingly.

[¶ 3] We hereby order that this decision be published in the regular manner, as provided under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(c).

[¶ 4] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, DALE V. SANDSTROM and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-Riemers
2001 ND 121 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 ND 19, 606 N.W.2d 108, 2000 N.D. LEXIS 25, 2000 WL 199433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strom-sell-v-council-for-concerned-citizens-inc-nd-2000.