Strojnik v. Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No.19-cv-03082-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 47 14 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., Defendant. 15
16 5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: October 14, 2020 LG-e<——— —> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strojnik v. Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (Strojnik v. Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.