Strohmeyer v. Borough of Little Ferry

56 A.2d 885, 136 N.J.L. 485, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 56 A.2d 885 (Strohmeyer v. Borough of Little Ferry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strohmeyer v. Borough of Little Ferry, 56 A.2d 885, 136 N.J.L. 485, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The appellant in this ease had been a police officer in the Borough of Little Eerry. On December 4th, 1945, he was suspended pending his trial on charges preferred against him. On September 9th, 1946, lie tvas given a trial and was found not guilty. The present action was for salary for the period from December 4th, 1945, to September 9th, 1946. The complaint was struck by the learned Judge of the Circuit Court and this action is before us on this appeal.

The right to suspend, pending a trial on charges, is granted by statute, R. S. 40:47-6. Under R. S. 40:46-34, it is provided that where a policeman or fireman has been illegally dismissed and such dismissal has been declared judicially illegal, the fireman or policeman shall be entitled to recover the salary of his office or employment for the period covered by the illegal dismissal. Dad the legislature also provided for recovery where a police officer was illegally suspended, the appellant’s right to recovery in this case would have been clear; but since no such right has been granted we are obliged to find that the ruling of the learned trial judge in striking *486 the complaint was in all respects proper. Sganga v. Teaneck Township, 130 N. J. L. 218. In that case the authorities are collected. Apart from statute that there is no right of recovery for a salary not earned seems clear.

The judgment under appeal will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. International Federation of Professional & Engineers, Local 195
780 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
State v. INTERN. FED., LOCAL
780 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
R.J. Gaydos Insurance Agency, Inc. v. National Consumer Insurance
773 A.2d 1132 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
RJ Gaydos Ins. Agency v. NAT. CONSUMER INS. CO.
773 A.2d 1132 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
Trustees of the Local 478 Trucking & Allied Industries Pension Fund v. Pirozzi
486 A.2d 1288 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Jalowiecki v. Leuc
440 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Mastrobattista v. Essex County Park Commission
215 A.2d 345 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
Schock v. Bd. of Rev., Div. Empl. SEC.
214 A.2d 40 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Graham v. City of Asbury Park
165 A.2d 864 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Rozmierski v. City of Newark
125 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Winne v. County of Bergen
121 A.2d 733 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
D'Ippolito v. Maguire
111 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Strohmeyer v. Borough of Little Ferry
71 A.2d 141 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.2d 885, 136 N.J.L. 485, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strohmeyer-v-borough-of-little-ferry-nj-1948.