Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United States

172 F. 295, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5699
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 21, 1909·No. No. 5,393·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The merchandise imported is salted anchovies and sardines, brought over in tin packages containing over TO cubic inches. The collector and the board agree that they should be classified under the language “if in other packages, forty per centum ad valorem,” contained in paragraph 258 of the tariff act of 1897. The importers insist that they should be classified under the phrase “all other fish (except shellfish) in tin packages,” or under the last phrase of said paragraph, “fish in packages, containing less than one-half barrel, and not specially provided for in this act.”

It is too clear for discussion that the fish in these packages are of the kinds of fish specially mentioned in the early part of paragraph 258. They cannot, therefore, be covered by the expression “all other fish.” When Congress said “if in other packages,” it undoubtedly meant other packages than those just immediately before described; and the tin package in which the imported fish come is certainly another package from those. Being specially provided for in the phrase under which they were assessed, they cannot be placed under the final, phrase.

Decision affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United States, 172 F. 295, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5699 (circtsdny 1909).

172 F. 295 (Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Meyer
32 C.C.P.A. 1 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1944)