Stroh v. Stroh

67 So. 3d 446, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2011 WL 3687429
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2011·No. 4D10-190·Published

Opinion

STREITFELD, JEFFREY R., Associate Judge.

In this appeal from a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, we affirm the trial court’s award of permanent periodic alimony, equitable distribution plan, and alimony set-off. These awards are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

We reverse the award of $4,000 constituting tenant security deposits, as this money was not marital property subject to equitable distribution and must be held by the Husband/Appellant as landlord.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stroh v. Stroh, 67 So. 3d 446, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2011 WL 3687429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

67 So. 3d 446 (Stroh v. Stroh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walter v. Walter
464 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)