Stroh v. Stroh
Opinion
In this appeal from a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, we affirm the trial court’s award of permanent periodic alimony, equitable distribution plan, and alimony set-off. These awards are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
We reverse the award of $4,000 constituting tenant security deposits, as this money was not marital property subject to equitable distribution and must be held by the Husband/Appellant as landlord.
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
67 So. 3d 446 (Stroh v. Stroh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.