Stroh v. Stroh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stroh v. Stroh

67 So. 3d 446, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2011 WL 3687429

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2011

Docket4D10-190

StatusPublished

This text of 67 So. 3d 446 (Stroh v. Stroh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stroh v. Stroh, 67 So. 3d 446, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13349, 2011 WL 3687429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

STREITFELD, JEFFREY R., Associate Judge.

In this appeal from a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, we affirm the trial court’s award of permanent periodic alimony, equitable distribution plan, and alimony set-off. These awards are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

We reverse the award of $4,000 constituting tenant security deposits, as this money was not marital property subject to equitable distribution and must be held by the Husband/Appellant as landlord.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI