Strobl v. Zidek

Seventh Circuit

Strobl v. Zidek

143 F.2d 592, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3135

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJune 21, 1944

DocketNo. 8520

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F.2d 592 (Strobl v. Zidek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strobl v. Zidek, 143 F.2d 592, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3135 (7th Cir. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has appealed from an order entered December 31, 1943, denying appellant’s motion, filed, December 7, 1943, to clarify an order made, November 18, 1932. This order denied a previously en[593]*593tered order discharging the debtor, who had been adjudged bankrupt, from his debts.

The bankrupt, John Zidek, Jr., filed a petition in bankruptcy in the U. S. District Court, January 7, 1924, and on the 11th of that month was adjudged a bankrupt. In June of that year, he filed a petition for discharge, and on March 26, 1928, an order of discharge was entered.

Appellant has since instituted various proceedings for the purpose of revoking and setting aside said order of discharge. One of his petitions was referred to a special master in 1929, and a hearing was had, and a report was filed, which was approved by the District Court. That order refused to vacate the order of discharge.

It appears to us from an examination of the record, which disclosed the foregoing facts, that the appeal herein is wholly without merit and is frivolous.

Judgment of District Court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI