Stritzinger v. VEC

Fourth Circuit

Stritzinger v. VEC

675 F. App'x 326

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-2150·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint because he failed to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly! we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the [327] reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. VEC, No. 5:16-mc-00021-KS (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint because he failed to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly! we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the [327] reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. VEC, No. 5:16-mc-00021-KS (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Stritzinger v. VEC, 675 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 326 (Stritzinger v. VEC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.