Stritzinger v. Asiedu

Fourth Circuit

Stritzinger v. Asiedu

671 F. App'x 83

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. 16-1810·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis,, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. Asiedu, No. 3:15-cv-05111-TLW (D.S.C. June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the- decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis,, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. Asiedu, No. 3:15-cv-05111-TLW (D.S.C. June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the- decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stritzinger v. Asiedu, 671 F. App'x 83 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 83 (Stritzinger v. Asiedu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.