Stritzinger v. Asiedu
This text of 671 F. App'x 83 (Stritzinger v. Asiedu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis,, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stritzinger v. Asiedu, No. 3:15-cv-05111-TLW (D.S.C. June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the- decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stritzinger-v-asiedu-ca4-2016.