Stripling v. State

645 So. 2d 589, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11342, 1994 WL 656611
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1994
DocketNo. 94-2153
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 645 So. 2d 589 (Stripling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stripling v. State, 645 So. 2d 589, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11342, 1994 WL 656611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. As to the second issue, defendant was properly convicted of armed robbery under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). The State need only show that defendant’s participation in the crime satisfied section 777.011, Florida Statutes (1989). The State need not show that defendant personally possessed the firearm. See id.; State v. McQuay, 403 So.2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Norris v. State, 360 So.2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byron Turner v. the State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Baker v. State
760 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Alfred v. State
678 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Carswell v. State
686 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 So. 2d 589, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11342, 1994 WL 656611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stripling-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.