Stripling v. State

645 So. 2d 589, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11342, 1994 WL 656611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 1994·No. No. 94-2153·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. As to the second issue, defendant was properly convicted of armed robbery under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). The State need only show that defendant’s participation in the crime satisfied section 777.011, Florida Statutes (1989). The State need not show that defendant personally possessed the firearm. See id.; State v. McQuay, 403 So.2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Norris v. State, 360 So.2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stripling v. State, 645 So. 2d 589, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11342, 1994 WL 656611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

645 So. 2d 589 (Stripling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byron Turner v. the State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Baker v. State
760 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Alfred v. State
678 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Carswell v. State
686 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)