Stripling v. Holton
68 Ga. 821
Opinion
Parol evidence is inadmissible to add conditions to a written contract absolute on its face. 40 Ga., 199; 56 Ib., 31; 57 Ib., 350; 60 Ib., 157, 614; Code, §1950, par. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stripling v. Holton, 68 Ga. 821 (Ga. 1882).
68 Ga. 821 (Stripling v. Holton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Citizens Bank
85 S.E. 1002 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Schofield-Burkett Construction Co. v. Rich
85 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Pitts v. Allen
72 Ga. 69 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)