Stripling v. Holton
68 Ga. 821
This text of 68 Ga. 821 (Stripling v. Holton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stripling v. Holton, 68 Ga. 821 (Ga. 1882).
Opinion
Parol evidence is inadmissible to add conditions to a written contract absolute on its face. 40 Ga., 199; 56 Ib., 31; 57 Ib., 350; 60 Ib., 157, 614; Code, §1950, par. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thompson v. Citizens Bank
85 S.E. 1002 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Schofield-Burkett Construction Co. v. Rich
85 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Pitts v. Allen
72 Ga. 69 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 Ga. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stripling-v-holton-ga-1882.