Stripinis v. Whitman-Hanson Regional District School Committee

372 N.E.2d 1313, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 853, 1978 Mass. App. LEXIS 687
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided March 2, 1978·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We view this matter, as we must, as an action under G. L. c. 71, § 43A, as appearing in St. 1975, c. 337. If the judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s action pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b), 365 Mass. 755-756 (1974), review of the ensuing judgment may not be had by way of appeal. MacKenzie v. School Comm. of Ipswich, 342 Mass. 612, 613-614 (1961), and cases cited. The proper method of raising the issues which the plaintiff has attempted to argue [854]*854in this court is discussed in Dixon v. School Comm. of Framingham, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 857 (1977).

Jeffrey M. Freedman for the plaintiff. James A. Toomey for the defendant.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stripinis v. Whitman-Hanson Regional District School Committee, 372 N.E.2d 1313, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 853, 1978 Mass. App. LEXIS 687 (Mass. Ct. App. 1978).

372 N.E.2d 1313 (Stripinis v. Whitman-Hanson Regional District School Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stripinis v. Whitman-Hanson Regional District School Committee
398 N.E.2d 509 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)