Stringfield v. Pender County

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina
DecidedJuly 21, 2021
Docket7:20-cv-00145
StatusUnknown

This text of Stringfield v. Pender County (Stringfield v. Pender County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stringfield v. Pender County, (E.D.N.C. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 7:20-cv-00145-M JOHNNY STRINGFIELD, Administratrix of ) the Estate of Javon Stringfield, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) OPINION ) AND ORDER PENDER COUNTY; PENDER COUNTY _ ) SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and SHERIFF ) CARSON SMITH (FORMER SHERIFF), in ) his official and individual capacities, ) ) Defendants. ) This matter comes before the court on Defendant Pender County Sheriff's Department’s (the “Department’”’) motion to dismiss the claims brought against it, filed November 18, 2020. [DE-12] Within its memorandum in support of its motion, the Department argues that it lacks the capacity to be sued as a matter of law. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure set forth that, for governmental entities, to sue or be sued [in federal court] is determined . . . by the law of the state where the court is located[.]” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b)(3); see Avery v. County of Burke, 660 F.2d 111, 113-14 (4th Cir. 1981) (“The capacity of a governmental body to be sued in the federal courts is governed by the law of the state in which the district court is held.”). Therefore, because this court is located within North Carolina, the court looks to North Carolina law to determine whether the Department can be sued. Under North Carolina law, counties and sheriffs can be sued. See N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 153A-11 (counties), 58-76-5 (sheriffs). But there is no North Carolina statute that allows a county □□□□□□□□□ department to be sued, and the Department has directed the court’s attention to case law from this court

holding that the absence of such a statute is fatal to claims brought against North Carolina county □□□□□□□□□ departments like the Department. [see DE-13 at 2-5 (citing Parker v. Bladen Cnty., 583 F. Supp. 2d 736, 740 (E.D.N.C. 2008) (granting county sheriff's department’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss: “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-11 acknowledges that a county is a legal entity which may be sued. However, there is no corresponding statute authorizing suit against a North Carolina county’s sheriff's department. Accordingly, the Bladen County Sheriff's Department lacks legal capacity to be sued.”))]; see also Wesley v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Cnty. Police Dep’t, No. 3:19-cv-00425-FDW-DCK, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181308, at *14-15 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2020) (same). Plaintiff does not invoke any authority holding otherwise in his response brief. [DE-26] Because Plaintiff does not, the court concludes that Plaintiff's claims against the Department must be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Parker, supra.

SO ORDERED this the zak day of Sly , 2021.

“thea tina RICHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Bladen County
583 F. Supp. 2d 736 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)
Avery v. County of Burke
660 F.2d 111 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stringfield v. Pender County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stringfield-v-pender-county-nced-2021.