Stringfield v. International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America

Sixth Circuit

Stringfield v. International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America

285 F.2d 764, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3623

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 7, 1960·No. No. 14054·Published

Opinion

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court dismissing the amended complaint be and is hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Levin, 190 F.Supp. 380. See also Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, 3 Cir., 275 F.2d 342; Fingar v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 277 F.2d. 698.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court dismissing the amended complaint be and is hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Levin, 190 F.Supp. 380. See also Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, 3 Cir., 275 F.2d 342; Fingar v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, 5 Cir., 277 F.2d. 698.

Stringfield v. International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, 285 F.2d 764, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3623 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

285 F.2d 764 (Stringfield v. International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related