Stringfellow v. State
This text of 1928 OK CR 234 (Stringfellow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, herein *303 after called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Mayes county on a charge of having possession of mash fit for distillation, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.
Judgment was rendered on April 10, 1926. The appeal was lodged in this court July 21, 1926. No notice of appeal as required .by section 2809, Comp. Stat. 1921, appears in the record, nor has any been filed in this court. Nor has any summons in error been issued and served, nor has the Attorney General entered any general appearance or waived summons in error. At the time judgment was entered, defendant gave notice in open court of intention to appeal, evidently having in mind section 782, Comp. Stat. 1921. Secton 782 relates solely to appeals in civil cases, and has no application to criminal cases. It does not repeal section 2809, supra. Merritt v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 194, 249 P. 436.
The attempted appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1928 OK CR 234, 268 P. 312, 40 Okla. Crim. 302, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stringfellow-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.